![]() Fletcher-1968 Obituary in the Delaware (OH) Gazette > Gerner-Alonzo J.-1940 Obituary in the Butler Eagle > Gerner-Alfonzo F.-1952 Obituary in The Butler Eagle > Gerner-Ada-1914 Obituary in The Butler (PA) Citizen Like this (perhaps minus the dashes, using commas instead?): It makes sense to have all individuals' information listed together. This is the preference some use, which seems cumbersome to me:Īnd then I came upon the suggestion to name sources in RM similar to the way I name images.īingo! I think that will work for me. When I searched online to see how others name sources the consensus is that it's a matter of personal preference. " means I have to scroll through all of them to find the one I'd like to use. But a long list of "Funeral Program for." and "Obituary of. I like it that the birth certificate for an individual can also be cited for the parents of that individual. I like the idea that these reference just one individual or event. > Wedding Anniversary Article for Robert Meinzens Bickerstaff (there are dozens of obituaries!) > Marriage Certificate for Gust Doyle and Beulah Gerner > Intestate Orphan's Court File of John Froman > Certificate of Birth for Daniel Bickerstaff These are some of the names of other sources in my RM program which are split: The master source can be reused but the details/transcription cannot be reused for others. (Edited to add: RootsMagic will show me who is attached to each individual source when I go to the Source List, choose a Source, click on the source, click "Print," and then click "Generate Report.") Nearly all of these sources could be used by dozens of individuals and families which, to my mind, makes them less useful when I'm documenting individuals. These are either so broad or so vague that I would have to search deep to find where and for whom they are used. > Birth Records for Jefferson County, Ohio, Vol. > All Saints Church, Newcastle-upon-Tyne, Baptism, 1828-1831 These are some of the names of sources in my RM program which are lumped: ![]() If the master source is reused, the citation for an individual attached to that source cannot easily be reused. Will it be (split, to use) for one individual and one event, or will the master source be (lumped and) used over and over again for different people at different times? It matters. Choosing a name, it seems to me, depends on how I will use the source in the future. This is what happens when I create a source citation in RM: after I select the source type and write the citation, the program then asks me to gave the master source a name. But the name is also about how to easily find the citation if I want to use it again for another person named in the source, e.g., the birth record that names not just the infant but also the parents. It comes down to how a citation can be reused and whether it can be done easily, and whether all the information in the source goes into the master text or into the detail text used for only one individual or event. It's a problem I'm determined to solve once and for all so I can get on with documenting my family history and cleaning up my database.Īt its root, the problem comes down to whether to lump or split citations. Choosing a name is an ongoing problem for me and it's the one thing that causes me to interrupt my genealogy and family history research. Click on the Tags link to see a list of every place the media item is used.I'm speaking of name for sources in RootsMagic. RootsMagic will also display the number of records which are currently using this media item. Primary - Make this the primary photo for the person.Scrapbook - check this box to include this photo in the scrapbook for the person.If you are editing the media from the Edit Person form, you will also see 2 additional options: Ref# - you can enter an optional reference number here.This can be used for any purpose you want, such as the date a photo was taken, or the date you entered it into the program. Date - an optional date for the media item.Clicking this field will slide in the note editor to enter your description. ![]()
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |